Re: Incorrect bodhi message "This update's test gating status has been changed to 'failed'."

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 9:13 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 4:08 PM Leigh Griffin <lgriffin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 8:40 PM Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 13:54 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2 2021 at 07:49:29 PM +0100, Leigh Griffin
> <lgriffin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Gating is optional so it shouldn't be causing an issue directly for
> > those who haven't opted in
>
> I believe this is incorrect, it's now required for critical path
> packages. Otherwise it wouldn't be running at all, because I don't
> believe we've opted-in to anything. (If we had opted in, where would we
> have configured that?)

Yes, that is right. There is now project-wide gating on openQA tests
for critpath updates.

Ah today I learned something new! Apologies for misinformation. 
>
> > > I should not receive any emails telling me that tests
> > >  have failed unless some test has actually failed.
> >
> > Agreed, go ahead and file it as a bug on the Bodhi tracker and we can
> > take a look at it
>
> I think we have a bug report already, actually, but I just don't know
> where it is. :/ I can report a new issue if nobody remembers where to
> find the existing one.

I fixed the bug, months ago, when you first reported it:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/4221
but the PR has not been merged, because Bodhi's CI is broken, and no-
one who has the power to merge the PR despite the CI failure has done
so. See:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/4221#issuecomment-860011362

I have tagged the blocking bug for my team to take a look at tomorrow, hopefully we can get these merged in. 

This has been an issue for me as well. I started work on trying to improve the intelligence on triggering offline updates from PackageKit, but the PR I submitted to propagate more data from Bodhi into updateinfo metadata hasn't been merged despite being approved for months for similar reasons: https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/4214

Thanks Neal, I added it to my list and have opened a dialog to get more insights into the current state of Bodhi. I'd like to understand why there is a bottleneck here from a merge permissions perspective. I will keep folks posted. 


--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


--

Leigh Griffin

Senior Engineering Manager

Red Hat Waterford

Communications House

Cork Road, Waterford City

lgriffin@xxxxxxxxxx    
M: +353877545162    
 IM: lgriffin

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux