Re: libc_malloc_debug.so vs .so.0 in glibc 2.34

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[cursed email aliases!]

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:42 AM Siddhesh Poyarekar <sipoyare@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 2:52 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Anyway this is not the reason why I'm writing this email on Fedora
> > devel list.  In the Fedora package we have:
> >
> >   $ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libc_malloc_debug.so
> >   glibc-devel-2.34-1.fc35.x86_64
> >   $ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libc_malloc_debug.so.0
> >   glibc-2.34-1.fc35.x86_64
> >
> > I'm wondering why it was decided to put the symlink and the file in
> > the two different packages?
> >
> > Is it intended that end users use:
> >
> >   LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libc_malloc_debug.so.0   # (1)
>
> This one is correct.
>
> > or
> >
> >   LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libc_malloc_debug.so     # (2)
> >
> > If it's (1) then that is a file, so why bother with the symlink?
>
> I have an open bug and PR to resolve this:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985048
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glibc/pull-request/37
>
> I waited because we were too close to the mass rebuild and then it
> fell off my plate, sorry :/
>
> > If it's (2) then that's a symlink to (1), so why have the possibility
> > of installing only the glibc package thus getting only the file
> > /usr/lib64/libc_malloc_debug.so.0 which is not useful on its own?
> >
> > Also is this feature intended for developers (glibc-devel) or everyone
> > (glibc)?  (My preference is "everyone" - we've found that asking bug
> > reporters to enable MALLOC_CHECK_ in an ad hoc way can be a good way
> > to see if a bug is a memory corruption problem.)
>
> The intent is to separate debugging from core functionality to improve
> security and performance (and make it easier for us to improve malloc
> in future but that's unrelated in this context), so it will likely end
> up in glibc-utils (that's where mtrace is) or its own package.  That
> will give administrators the option to remove libc_malloc_debug.so.0
> from the system.  We (i.e. glibc package maintainers) are yet to agree
> on the right place for this, mainly due to forgetting about it after
> the mass rebuild.
>
> Siddhesh
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux