* Ankur Sinha [20/08/2021 12:27] : > > I totally understand the point of the system we have in place, but I do > see how it doesn't quite address the case of upstream developers or > individuals who'd just like to maintain their few packages. To be fair, the system does address the case of the upstream developers: it is recommended that they co-maintain the packages of their software but leave ownership of the packages to experienced packagers. This has been explained to Joan a number of times. > So, here, I'd rather have Joan, who is the developer and has been > actively engaging with the community to get the package included > (including going through the review), and so who I'd trust to look after > their package, on the team than not. The small issue I have is that, while Joan claims to want to become a packager in the mails he sends to the devel list@, he a) is very secretive about what steps he has taken to seek out a sponsor and b) has said in the review bug that he has no intentions of following the guidelines. Let's hope this dichotomy gets resolved sooner than later. Emmanuel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
