Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Dennis Gilmore:

> We intentionally never looked at enabling that and always had no plans
> to support multi-lib on Arm

It's not multilib.  Buildroots aren't multilib.

I'm pretty sure no one but Fedora is building 32-bit Arm binaries on
32-bit Arm kernels.  It's very much a dead end.

Debian uses 64-bit kernels:

| Package: glibc
| Version: 2.31-16
| Source Version: 2.31-16
| Distribution: sid
| Machine Architecture: arm64
| Host Architecture: armhf
| Build Architecture: armhf
| Build Type: any

<https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=glibc&arch=armhf&ver=2.31-16&stamp=1629282244&raw=0>

Others use cross-compilers.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux