On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 5:27 PM Michael J Gruber <mjg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The easy way out :) > I'm maintaining a few stale packages, though. Just wondering, if the packages are stale, why convert them? Packages that change or have new versions often do benefit from rpmautospec much more than something that never changes, IMO ... > I wasn't sure about the x vs x+1. Good to know it's fine. Well, if you run "fedpkg srpm", it should contain the preprocessed .spec file, with the calculated release number as "%global release_number" in the header, and the processed %changelog. That might give you hints about what goes wrong in some of your cases. For example, if there are "uncommitted changes", rpmautospec will increment the release number by 1 automatically, with a changelog message of "Uncommitted changes" :-) Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
