Re: Packages that fail to install in Fedora 35 and might be retired one week before the beta freeze

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:20 -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> The former owner appears to also be the upstream, so they might be
> back, but at least in the meantime, do you want to take it now that
> it's building again?

	Hi,
I'm not sure I'm the best person, I do not follow the development of
the libpst at all, neither I've any idea about its internals. A simple
revert of the orphan would be the best choice, from my point of view,
because the orphan was kind of mistake, due to no problem with the
package itself. I do not know why it had been missed earlier. It
happens. If there's no other choice, I can take it temporarily.
	Bye,
	Milan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux