Petr Menšík wrote: > No, that is the reason why I proposed it. Guidelines already state > *-filesystem packages does not have to be depended on [1]. Just one, > probably systemd or systemd-libs, should depend on it to get it > installed. All other can then just ignore the directory exactly as you > have proposed. In this case it would not be breaking guidelines, but > according to them instead. > > 1. > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_directory_ownership That is contradicted by the following quote from the Packaging Guidelines: | Sometimes, it may be preferable for such directories to be owned by | an "artificial filesystem" package, such as mozilla-filesystem. These | packages are designed to be explicitly required when other packages | store files in their directories, thus, in such situations, these | packages should explicitly Require the artificial filesystem package | and not multiply own those directories. That is, each of those 1600 packages would need to require systemd-filesystem. Perhaps the filesystem package should own these directories? Not systemd-filesystem, just filesystem. The case is rather similar to /usr/share/bash-completion, /usr/share/man, /usr/share/info and various other directories that filesystem owns. Björn Persson
Attachment:
pgpc2I5PnxSBa.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
