Hello Jerry,
On 8/4/21 3:57 PM, Jerry James wrote:
Am I stepping on your toes with this? That is, had you already
started working on a v5 package? I don't want to get in your way if
so. On the other hand, if you haven't, would you like to comaintain
the one I'm working on?
No, I haven't, so feel free to continue.
Previous attempt to upgrade fontawesome wasn't successful (rhbz#1854348
if you haven't seen that already), so I was just trying to estimate the
magnitude of disaster :)
Fabio (@fale) did the aforementioned upgrade and could be more inclined
to comaintain fa5.
One potentially confusing thing is that FA5 consists of two fonts: Font
Awesome 5 Free and Font Awesome 5 Brands. fa-free-fonts could be
interpreted as containing only the former one.
Another is the whole parallel-installable thing and a need to guess
which package is 4 or 5 (and 6 in a not-so-distant future).
I'd suggest fontawesome5-fonts, or at least something with explicit
version in the package name.
Okay, that makes sense. I guess that means that I didn't handle the
subpackages correctly, then. I'll give this some thought. Thanks for
the input!
--
With best regards,
Aleksei Bavshin
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
