Re: rpmautospec deployment into production

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021-07-19 09:07, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
However, copr seems to understand rpmautospec. Here is a build that
started from a specfile that uses rpmautospec and completed
successfully:

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lcts/nextcloud/build/2329596/

Not quite. It doesn't error, but it doesn't deal with the macros either. %autochangelog should be replaced with the actual changelog during builds, which doesn't happen on Copr. I think, though I haven't tested, that it also always uses 1.<disttag> as the release.

See e.g. the .src.rpm here for a rpmautospec build on koji

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1780088

Christopher
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux