Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> writes: *snip* > What is the situation wrt new packages? Should we enforce the use of > rpmautospec during reviews or is it completely optional? I think we should encourage the usage of rpmautospec for new packages, provided that the packager feels comfortable enough to use it. E.g. I wouldn't suggest it for someone's first package. But this shouldn't become a *MUST*, at least not yet. Cheers, Dan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
