On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 03:21:24PM -0500, Tony Asleson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 7:04 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 01:26:19PM -0500, Tony Asleson wrote: > > > Upstream pywbem project took 2 internal libraries and broke them out > > > into separate libraries. I asked if they would be OK with maintaining > > > these new packages in fedora and they said yes[1]. They followed the > > > process and asked for a sponsor and got no response [2]. > > > > Sorry about that. > > No worries > > > You could add them in as co-maintainers, provided you are willing to > > show them how packaging works, etc. > > > > See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Become_a_co-maintainer > > This seems to imply co-maintaining an existing package, not a new package? Right. You would need to get the packages reviewed and added in any case. But then you could add upstream as co-maintainers. :) kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
