Upstream pywbem project took 2 internal libraries and broke them out into separate libraries. I asked if they would be OK with maintaining these new packages in fedora and they said yes[1]. They followed the process and asked for a sponsor and got no response [2]. They have now pitched the idea of using "vendorize" to meet this requirement [3]. However, I believe the answer to this from a fedora packaging standpoint is no. Is this correct? I would think if the upstream project could somehow use vendorize before they packaged the upstream release tarball, that it would be OK? Thanks! -Tony [1] https://github.com/pywbem/pywbem/issues/2434#issuecomment-685825801 [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/SJ42NEMAMKMIOA5VXBPKLQ2J5GDZ5RMK/ [3] https://github.com/pywbem/pywbem/issues/2434#issuecomment-877767867 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
