Re: Fedora Goals -- LSB-compliant/ideal init for FC5+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Nottingham wrote:

Edginton, Brian (GE Healthcare) (Brian.Edginton@xxxxxx) said:
No, CDDL (like ASPL, actually) isn't a viable license for Fedora code.
Specifics?

Just the hazy memory of a conversation I had. I'll try to dig up
some.

It's GPL-incompatible, of course.

What could be done with it is the same thing that's done with
launchd; look at the docs/manauls, see the general way it works,
and go from there. But looking at the code and trying to reimplement
it that way is right out.

Bill

That reminds me. What are we to do regarding the network scripts? Bug 145464 (gre scripts) springs in my mind right now. We have two separate issues. The lack of network scripts for stuff like gre/ipip and many others. How should this be integrated in the new init stuff. Like a service or lower-level (rc.sysinit style but in the new init would probably be in C) ?

I purpose that a new wiki page should be set-up for this. It's the only place where only the ideas remain and not the eventual flames that a thread might contain. As a bonus it can be better organised, thus easier to read than the email archives.

Razvan

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux