Re: Why doesn't iconv know ISO-8859-2 in rawhide?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:47 AM Zdenek Dohnal <zdohnal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Aha, it seems the rawhide buildroot from 6/23 still contained glibc with
> recommends on new package and not hard requires.

Sorry yes, we haven't done a build yet.  I expect one to come out next
week with this fix and the fix for some other breakages.

> I've explicitly added glibc-gconv-extra as a buildrequires for vim now -
> although as you told it is unnecessary right now, I guess it is a good
> thing to track what the package actually needs (dependencies can change
> with time, as I found out painfully over the years :D ).

I've got a releng ticket[1] out to pull glibc-gconv-extra into the
minimal buildroot so that we can weaken the dependency again.  That
way every package won't have to explicitly mention this dependency.

Thanks,
Siddhesh

[1] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10176
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux