Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On June 24, 2021 9:22:51 PM UTC, "Miro Hrončok" <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On 24. 06. 21 23:07, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> Dne 24. 06. 21 v 15:48 Tomas Tomecek napsal(a):
>>>> One thing to consider is that the upstream tarballs might be
>cryptographically
>>>> signed and packages should verify the signature in %prep.
>>> This is a very good point - in such a case, we should always pull
>the
>>> official upstream tarball instead of generating a new one downstream
>> 
>> Does it matter? If you are able to generate byte2byte identical
>tarball then 
>> you can choose any of them.
>
>AFAIK git does not grantee to produce byte2byte identical archives
>across 
>different versions of git, zlib, gzip etc. So even if upstream signs
>the git 
>generated archive, generating a byte2byte identical one might be
>tricky.

Especially with xz, which iirc has reproducibility issues in parallel mode.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux