On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:52 AM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 08:52:02PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > ...snip... > > > > I see that the ansible SRPM in rawhide has already discarded any > > support for python2, so that cannot be easily backported to RHEL 7 > > with continuing use of python2. Our friends doing EPEL support will > > have to either do considerable work to continue python2 support, say > > with "pyp2rpm", or cooperate with the switch to python3. > > The epel7 ansible (classic/2.9) builds both python2 and python2 > versions, you can use whatever one you prefer. The epel7 branch has just > diverged from rawhide. It's also as up to date as rawhide is version > wise. Exactly. It's had to be diverged. And they're not identical versions, epel7 has 2.9.21, and Fedora 34 has 2.9.23. > I guess I don't understand what your concern is here... if we required > rawhide to build for all targets, why do we have branches at all? I'm suggesting that we avoid making things more difficult if we don't need to. > To me it's a balancing act... some level of conditional is worth it to > allow rawhide's spec to work on other branches, but when it reaches a > level where it's confusing, it's better to break the relationship and > let branches diverge to handle their branch/target only. Sure. I'm suggesting that there is a risk and difficulty to abandoning python2-setuptools. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
