Re: F35 Change: Broken RPATH will fail rpmbuild (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Tom Stellard:

> Instead of doing two scratch builds, I just added:
> %global __brp_check_rpaths time /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths to the spec file
> and did a scratch build[1].
>
> The results on x86_64 were:
>
> real	13m51.517s
> user	8m53.216s
> sys	7m34.105s
>
> Overall build time for the scratch build was 88m37s, so  that means check-rpaths
> accounted for 15% of the build time.  I'm going to do some more tests on some
> of the larger packages I maintain (llvm and clang) and see what the impact is.
>
> I do think it would be worth trying to profile the script and see if there is
> room for optimization.

It is fairly bad for glibc as well.

I think this has to be written properly and maintained in elfutils.  The
script doesn't even invoke readelf correctly.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux