Re: x86_64-v2 in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 10:26 AM Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 3:23 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 02:57:17PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > > >We'll at least gather information about capabilities of Fedora
> > > >users hardware.
> > > Telemetry is evil. It must not be allowed.
> >
> > Well, that's certainly A Position. I don't think it's anything nearly so
> > absolute, though, and depends on what, who, how, why, and a host of other
> > things. And "it can help us answer questions like this for our community" is
> > a pretty non-evil "why".
>
> I think there can be a lot of benefit in anonymized hardware data (not
> mandatory).  It does help answer questions like this, but more
> importantly, it would make a lot of the kernel work a bit easier, or
> at least more focused.   It answers questions like, "should we enable
> these drivers as they are likely to be used?" or "can we disable these
> drivers because no one is using them?". It is also very helpful in
> working out bug priority in drivers.  A lot of people never bother
> filing bugs, and are happy to keep booting a known good kernel since
> we allow parallel installs. If we get a few users chiming in, and
> realize the hardware in question is used by a significant chunk of
> users, it would  tell me that perhaps that should take priority over a
> bug which impacts hardware with considerably fewer users.   Yes, you
> have to be extremely careful about what data you collect, and how that
> data is handled, but if done correctly, there are a lot of benefits.


I agree. I'm curious how many folks have TPMs at all, if they're 1.2
enabled or 2.0; whether the system is Secure Boot capable, enabled or
disabled; whether the firmware is BIOS, UEFI, coreboot.


-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux