Re: Let's retire original glib and gtk+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 6:58 AM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi, nobody proposed removing gtk2. The problem there is gconf2. gtk2
> does not depend on gconf2.
>
> Packages to be retired:
>
>  * glib
>  * gtk+
>  * gconf2

Got it.  None of the packages I listed depend directly on gconf2.
They seem to be on the list due to:

ocaml-lablgtk -> libgnomeui -> GConf2
                              |
                              ---> libgnome -> GConf2

which means no action is really needed for those packages, right?
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux