Re: Tomcat Package Changes in Rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 10:56 AM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 1:47 PM Coty Sutherland
<csutherl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry to be a bit late to the party, but in response to some indirect dependencies being orphaned I've taken the opportunity to clean up the Tomcat package a little. I have removed the following "features" from tomcat:
>
> 1) I dropped the "examples" webapp from Tomcat, which is recommended by the Security Considerations page of the upstream project anyway. This removed our dependency on the tomcat-taglibs-standard package.
> 2) Due to changes in the javapackages-local package (%add_maven_depmap was finally removed), I dropped the maven pom files from the tomcat packages as I feel that their usefulness is limited anyway. If you need to use the poms, Maven Central should work.
> 3) I've removed the tomcat-jsvc subpackage from the distribution as it isn't very useful either. This removes our dependency on the apache-commons-daemon package. This also removed the logrotate config that was offered since it was used within the tomcat-jsvc package.
> 4) Dropped geronimo-saaj (aka jakarta-saaj) as it's no longer required by Tomcat 9+.
> 5) Dropped geronimo-jaxrpc (aka jakarta-xml-rpc), which provided the webservices naming factory resources that are generally unused. This was only a build time dependency, so it wasn't used at runtime (unless users were explicitly installing it for their webapp).
>
> If anyone has issues with these changes, please let me know ASAP.

It looks like 2) is causing problems with resteasy, and in turn
pki-core and dogtag-pki (FreeIPA components):
nothing provides mvn(org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-servlet-api) needed by
pki-resteasy-core

resteasy is built with maven and depends on tomcat, so the pom files
are actually needed ...

That is the worst news I've gotten in a while :/ How many maven artifacts are being used? Could I get away with only providing poms/artifacts for the servlet/jsp/el implementations or do they need all 30+ artifacts?


Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux