Re: 📦 Advice on packaging azure-cli

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/2/21 9:07 AM, Benjamin Beasley wrote:
I personally think the individual packages approach will be easier to maintain in the long run. (If you do go down that road, I’m planning to help review them.)

I am leaning in that direction, too. Mohamed (the current maintainer) and I (new co-maintainer) have been talking about it in BZ 1953789[0].

While it sure is super quick to jam everything into one spec or one binary RPM, I keep stumbling over tiny problems that keep popping up one after the other.

Thanks for offering to help review and for the continued optimism, Ben. 🤗

[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953789

--
Major Hayden

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x737051E0C1011FB1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux