On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 06:26 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > [...] > > But some other channels that are not Fedora channels, but which a lot > > of Fedora people are interested in, decided to move, or at least to > > tell people that they also had a channel on the new network. Then > > Freenode peremptorily took over those channels for posting links to the > > new channel. > > In the cases where the projects announced their outright move to a new > server, it stands to reason that keeping an "official" (#name) channel > is no longer appropriate at the old network. The response of cleaning > up after a no-longer-official channel cannot logically be used to > justify moving the channel in the first place - this is the circular > reasoning I was referring to. The response to channel B moving or just referring to a new channel for B on a different server, however, can inform channel A's decision to move. Which is what I said. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
