On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 04:07 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 10:43:02PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 11:42 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > As an aside, perhaps the FESCO meeting agendas/minutes should be > > > publicly available somewhere. Then people who want to volunteer for > > > stuff like that would have a place to look. At the very least, it > > > provides the community with an idea of what's happening and where things > > > are headed. > > > > Yes, they should. This is partially my fault as I started writing up > > reasonable minutes and then never posted them anywhere. I can't promise > > a change for this week as I may not be able to make the FESCO meeting > > due to real life concerns, but for next week, I will _commit_ to making > > them available to the world at large. At least by mailing to > > fedora-extras-list and I'll also try to get them so they can at least be > > linked from fedora.redhat.com. > > Thanks, this is a painful routine, but from my experience as Gnome secretary > it's important for the community and it's better to have not perfect minutes > delivered quickly after the meeting than perfect minutes posted 3 weeks > later (when faced with "I should finish the minutes and post them when I have > more time" I would suggest to just post them as is, then the worse which can > happen is that people will ask more question and raise awareness :-) +1 <governance> The reason that most board agendas begin with "approval of the minutes from the last meeting" is specifically so that minutes can be distributed quickly and corrected later if there's a problem. Buffering minutes to get them right leads to more trouble than it's worth. </governance> M -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
