Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > The truth is that most people know about it, and have decided that they can > go 'meh' and keep living. I am well aware that most people don't think for a second about computer security. I see examples every day. They tend to begin caring after they find out that they personally have been owned. So your argument is that programs should be written insecurely to make the few who care as insecure as the majority? I shouldn't even have the option to care about security? Otherwise I don't see how what you wrote is an argument in this debate. > Instead IPP, LPD and other > print protocols have always been written with the assumption that the local > network is some level of secure. And I always try to avoid using protocols that assume that the local link is secure. That's one of the reasons why my printer is connected by USB, and I would like to continue to have that choice. Björn Persson
Attachment:
pgpC1HUHvvKXH.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
