Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, May 20, 2021 1:15:57 AM WEST Ian McInerney wrote:

> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 9:56 PM Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:39 AM Michael J Gruber <mjg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> >

> > wrote:

> > > I'd say that packaging a texlive file in another package is wrong

> >

> > anyways, so I'd suggest 3) in any case, with the possibility that someone

> > can still take up auctex, fix the emacs-lisp error and make auctex depend

> > on texlive-preview (and, for good measure, fix the unversioned obsoletes

> > for tetex-preview).

> >

> >

> > It looks like an update to the latest version fixes the FTBFS.  Since

> > I use this package from time to time, I'll take it.  Comaintainers

> > welcome.

> > --

> > Jerry James

>

> Thanks!


+1

I am also (positively) affected by your decision.


--

Jos�b�o

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux