On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:39 AM Michael J Gruber <mjg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'd say that packaging a texlive file in another package is wrong anyways, so I'd suggest 3) in any case, with the possibility that someone can still take up auctex, fix the emacs-lisp error and make auctex depend on texlive-preview (and, for good measure, fix the unversioned obsoletes for tetex-preview). It looks like an update to the latest version fixes the FTBFS. Since I use this package from time to time, I'll take it. Comaintainers welcome. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
