Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> spec
> actually provides a "tex-preview" package that is just preview.sty and
> is used by several packages to do tex rendering and preview:
> $ repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires tex-preview
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:29 ago on Tue 18 May 2021 11:25:34 PM
> BST.
> R-tikzDevice-0:0.12.3.1-4.fc34.src
> R-tikzDevice-0:0.12.3.1-4.fc34.x86_64
> dot2tex-0:2.11.3-9.fc34.noarch
> emacs-auctex-0:12.1-9.fc33.noarch
> gnuplot-latex-0:5.2.8-7.fc34.noarch
> ktikz-0:0.13.1-2.fc34.x86_64
> latex2html-0:2020.2-3.fc34.noarch
> psi4-1:1.3.2-10.fc35.src
> python-matplotlib-0:3.4.2-1.fc35.src
> python-mplcairo-0:0.4-1.fc35.src
> python-networkx-0:2.5.1-2.fc35.src
> qtikz-0:0.13.1-2.fc34.x86_64
> sdcc-0:4.0.0-5.fc34.src
> texlive-collection-latexextra-9:svn54851-38.fc35.noarch
> texstudio-0:3.1.1-1.fc35.x86_64
> 
> I have no need for the emacs portion of this package and only need the
> preview.sty portion for texstudio, so I really don't want to take it on as
> a full package. I can see three options for this:
> 1) Someone adopts the full package and maintains it (it was orphaned for
> FTBFS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923372)
> 2) It gets retired and I have to introduce a new package just for the tex
> file
> 3) The texlive-preview subpackage gets renabled in the main texlive
> distribution and provides this instead (since CPAN also contains this file
> and includes it inside upstream texlive technically, but we just don't
> package it there).
> 
> My preference is either 1 or 3 happens, since I think it would be bad to
> have a standalone package maintained independently for just that tex file.
> 
> Does anyone use the emacs plugin this provides (auctex) and would be
> willing to take on this package?
> 
> -Ian

I'd say that packaging a texlive file in another package is wrong anyways, so I'd suggest 3) in any case, with the possibility that someone can still take up auctex, fix the emacs-lisp error and make auctex depend on texlive-preview (and, for good measure, fix the unversioned obsoletes for tetex-preview).
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux