> spec > actually provides a "tex-preview" package that is just preview.sty and > is used by several packages to do tex rendering and preview: > $ repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires tex-preview > Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:29 ago on Tue 18 May 2021 11:25:34 PM > BST. > R-tikzDevice-0:0.12.3.1-4.fc34.src > R-tikzDevice-0:0.12.3.1-4.fc34.x86_64 > dot2tex-0:2.11.3-9.fc34.noarch > emacs-auctex-0:12.1-9.fc33.noarch > gnuplot-latex-0:5.2.8-7.fc34.noarch > ktikz-0:0.13.1-2.fc34.x86_64 > latex2html-0:2020.2-3.fc34.noarch > psi4-1:1.3.2-10.fc35.src > python-matplotlib-0:3.4.2-1.fc35.src > python-mplcairo-0:0.4-1.fc35.src > python-networkx-0:2.5.1-2.fc35.src > qtikz-0:0.13.1-2.fc34.x86_64 > sdcc-0:4.0.0-5.fc34.src > texlive-collection-latexextra-9:svn54851-38.fc35.noarch > texstudio-0:3.1.1-1.fc35.x86_64 > > I have no need for the emacs portion of this package and only need the > preview.sty portion for texstudio, so I really don't want to take it on as > a full package. I can see three options for this: > 1) Someone adopts the full package and maintains it (it was orphaned for > FTBFS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923372) > 2) It gets retired and I have to introduce a new package just for the tex > file > 3) The texlive-preview subpackage gets renabled in the main texlive > distribution and provides this instead (since CPAN also contains this file > and includes it inside upstream texlive technically, but we just don't > package it there). > > My preference is either 1 or 3 happens, since I think it would be bad to > have a standalone package maintained independently for just that tex file. > > Does anyone use the emacs plugin this provides (auctex) and would be > willing to take on this package? > > -Ian I'd say that packaging a texlive file in another package is wrong anyways, so I'd suggest 3) in any case, with the possibility that someone can still take up auctex, fix the emacs-lisp error and make auctex depend on texlive-preview (and, for good measure, fix the unversioned obsoletes for tetex-preview). _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure