----- Original Message ----- > From: "Miro Hrončok" <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Kaleb Keithley" <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2021 12:26:54 AM > Subject: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers > > On 19. 05. 21 0:17, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:15 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx > > <mailto:mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > > > Full report available at: > > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-05-18.txt > > <https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-05-18.txt> > > grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. > > > > > > rubygem-maruku? > > Indeed. > > > If I'm reading your report correctly it's saying that it's pcs which > > depends on > > rubygem-maruku. (And glusterfs, or more specifically, glusterfs-ganesha > > depends > > on pcs.) > > That is also correct. > > > I took the dummy's way out (rather than simply trust the report) and > > installed > > pcs (and a bunch of other things before I realized what the report was > > saying) > > on both my f34 and f35/rawhide boxes. In both cases rubygem-maruku was > > _not_ > > installed. > > The problematic dependency is a transitive build dependency. Your test only > verifies runtime dependencies. > > > Also `rpm -q --requires pcs` did not list rubygem-maruku. > > Similarly, this only queries direct runtime dependencies. > > ---- > > From the full linked report: > > > Depending on: rubygem-maruku (43), status change: 2021-05-06 (1 weeks ago) > > rubygem-tilt (maintained by: valtri, vondruch) > > rubygem-tilt-2.0.10-4.fc34.src requires rubygem(asciidoctor) = 2.0.15, > > rubygem(maruku) = 0.7.2 > > > > pcs (maintained by: cfeist, idevat, mlisik, omular, tojeline) > > pcs-0.10.8-1.fc34.src requires rubygem-tilt = 2.0.10-4.fc34 > > pcs-0.10.8-1.fc34.x86_64 requires rubygem-tilt = 2.0.10-4.fc34 > > > So, technically: > > - Once rubygem-maruku is retired, rubygem-tilt fails to build. > - Iff rubygem-tilt is not fixed, it will be orphaned and retired > eventually. > - Once rubygem-tilt is retired, pcs fails to build and fails to install. > - When pcs fails to install, so does glusterfs-ganesha. > > > The script creating this output is run and developed by Fedora > > Release Engineering. Please report issues at its pagure instance: > > https://pagure.io/releng/ <https://pagure.io/releng/> > > > > > > Should I file a report? ;-) > > If you know how to present the information in a less confusing way, please do > file a report. AFAIK the maruku gem is used during rubygem-tilt build only for integration tests. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-tilt/blob/af5f5083047697371b8e4197215a5223b761feba/f/rubygem-tilt.spec#_27 I've created a PR removing the dependency: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-tilt/pull-request/1 Regards, Pavel > > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > IRC: mhroncok _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
