Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19. 05. 21 0:17, Kaleb Keithley wrote:


On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:15 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:


    Full report available at:
    https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-05-18.txt
    <https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-05-18.txt>
    grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.


rubygem-maruku?

Indeed.

If I'm reading your report correctly it's saying that it's pcs which depends on rubygem-maruku. (And glusterfs, or more specifically, glusterfs-ganesha depends on pcs.)

That is also correct.

I took the dummy's way out (rather than simply trust the report) and installed pcs (and a bunch of other things before I realized what the report was saying) on both my f34 and f35/rawhide boxes. In both cases rubygem-maruku was _not_ installed.

The problematic dependency is a transitive build dependency. Your test only verifies runtime dependencies.

Also `rpm -q --requires pcs` did not list rubygem-maruku.

Similarly, this only queries direct runtime dependencies.

----

From the full linked report:

Depending on: rubygem-maruku (43), status change: 2021-05-06 (1 weeks ago)
	rubygem-tilt (maintained by: valtri, vondruch)
		rubygem-tilt-2.0.10-4.fc34.src requires rubygem(asciidoctor) = 2.0.15, rubygem(maruku) = 0.7.2

	pcs (maintained by: cfeist, idevat, mlisik, omular, tojeline)
		pcs-0.10.8-1.fc34.src requires rubygem-tilt = 2.0.10-4.fc34
		pcs-0.10.8-1.fc34.x86_64 requires rubygem-tilt = 2.0.10-4.fc34


So, technically:

 - Once rubygem-maruku is retired, rubygem-tilt fails to build.
 - Iff rubygem-tilt is not fixed, it will be orphaned and retired eventually.
 - Once rubygem-tilt is retired, pcs fails to build and fails to install.
 - When pcs fails to install, so does glusterfs-ganesha.

    The script creating this output is run and developed by Fedora
    Release Engineering. Please report issues at its pagure instance:
    https://pagure.io/releng/ <https://pagure.io/releng/>


Should I file a report? ;-)

If you know how to present the information in a less confusing way, please do file a report.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux