On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 06:38:33PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > I wouldn't say so. I'd say "package both versions as separate > non-modular RPM packages with unique names" is the general answer > when different versions of the package are desired. > > However, the problem here is different. We don't want 2 different > versions packaged in Rawhide AND 2 different versions packaged in > ELN. We want to allow package versions in ELN and Rawhide to be > different. This is exactly a case that modularity is supposed to handle. Two different versions packaged only one time each, built for both targets automatically, with one the default on target A and the other the default on target B, output, but with either version selectable in either target. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
