On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 1:01 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 14. 05. 21 16:29, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > * Fedora wants to use the latest version of an upstream, but ELN wants > > to stay on LTS releases (e.g. Firefox) > > About this use case: > > Is ELN still consumed as an "add-on repo" for Rawhide, or that is no > longer true? Becasue if it is still the case, this might not work properly. > That's a really good question that I don't have a solid answer to at the moment. I'm not sure it would *ultimately* be a major issue, as it's less likely for ELN to have *newer* packages than Rawhide does (and if they're older, DNF will basically ignore them unless specifically requested). I'd like us to get to a point where ELN is consistently installable, even if that's not an "official" goal. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
