Re: Let's retire original glib and gtk+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 9:45 AM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Um... not that I know of.
>
> Honestly, I don't know anything about GLib 1 other than that it's very
> old. I think if I were trying to port Sagemath, I would just upgrade
> the build system to GLib 2 and see how many compiler errors you get....

It turns out that surf-geometry is the only package on that list that
directly depends on glib 1.  The others depend on surf-geometry,
directly or transitively.  That's a very old (and, frankly, buggy)
piece of software there.  I'll see what can be done with it.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux