Hi, On 28/04/2021 16:27, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:27 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Is there any preference for fuse3 over fuse2? I moved a package over to fuse3 yesterday[1]. The API[2] seems a bit cleaner, but it's no big deal. However it's not really feasible to support both. Since I maintain several other fuse-using packages in Fedora, we have to pick one or the other. I notice also that almost no other packages have moved to fuse3: $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libfuse.so.2()(64bit)' --qf '%{name}' | sort -u | wc -l 62 $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libfuse3.so.3()(64bit)' --qf '%{name}' | sort -u | wc -l 7 Are we going to deprecate fuse2 at some point? Encourage upstreams to upgrade? One other minor point: BSDs can emulate fuse (which is essentially a Linux-only API), but their emulation seems to be of fuse2 only. Rich. [1] https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commit/c74c7d7f01975e708b510e518895088fc61b5623 [2] https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/releases/tag/fuse-3.0.0I think we eventually want everything moving to fuse3, but that's a *slow* process...
Miklos, is that your eventual plan? Steve. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
