On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:27 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Is there any preference for fuse3 over fuse2? I moved a package over
> to fuse3 yesterday[1]. The API[2] seems a bit cleaner, but it's no
> big deal. However it's not really feasible to support both. Since I
> maintain several other fuse-using packages in Fedora, we have to pick
> one or the other.
>
> I notice also that almost no other packages have moved to fuse3:
>
> $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libfuse.so.2()(64bit)' --qf '%{name}' | sort -u | wc -l
> 62
>
> $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libfuse3.so.3()(64bit)' --qf '%{name}' | sort -u | wc -l
> 7
>
> Are we going to deprecate fuse2 at some point? Encourage upstreams to
> upgrade?
>
> One other minor point: BSDs can emulate fuse (which is essentially a
> Linux-only API), but their emulation seems to be of fuse2 only.
>
> Rich.
>
> [1] https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commit/c74c7d7f01975e708b510e518895088fc61b5623
> [2] https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/releases/tag/fuse-3.0.0
>
I think we eventually want everything moving to fuse3, but that's a
*slow* process...
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
