Hi Hans, On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 3:47 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Also I hope it is ok if I pick your brain a bit on a java > packaging issue which I've been having. > > I maintain a couple of java leave packages (games) + some deps > which AFAIK are only used by these games. > > One of these deps (dom4j) has been FTBFS since F34: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923601 > > I've been looking into this and the actual problem seems to > be with Java 9 now including what once was the org.relaxng.datatype > except they did not just bundle it, they also changed where it > sits in the namespace to com.sun.tools.rngdatatype <sigh> > > Just doing a s/org.relaxng.datatype/com.sun.tools.rngdatatype/ > got me a bit further, but it seems that msv, which is a dep of > dom4j needs to be rebuild first with the same search-replace > done on it and the FTBFS bug of msv is stuck because of one > of its deps getting orphaned+retired : > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923446 > > So I think I can fix this by: > > 1. Unorphaning jvnet-parent, which is the missing msv dep You can unorphan/unretire it, but removing dependency on jvnet-parent is another choice. Probably better choice as jvnet-parent is no longer developed or maintained by upstream. > 2. Do a s/org.relaxng.datatype/com.sun.tools.rngdatatype/ in msv, rebuild > 3. Do a s/org.relaxng.datatype/com.sun.tools.rngdatatype/ in dom4j, rebuild relaxngDatatype was retired in Fedora. A replacement is jaxb-relaxng-datatype package (built from jaxb source package), but it uses a different namespace. Therefore steps 2 and 3 seem correct and necessary. > And then either do this only for rawhide, or push all 3 modified > packages to F34 in a single bodhi update. > > Mikolaj, does this sounds like a reasonable plan to you; or > should I approach this differently? Yes, that sounds good. I would also double check to see whether msv/dom4j are really needed by your packages. > Also if yes this is a reasonable plan any advice on also > pushing the fixed packages to F34, or not ? I am in favor of F34 update. Users of dom4j/msv that do not rely on relaxngDatatype-related functionality should be unaffected by the update. Users that do rely on it would get it fixed. > > Regards, > > Hans > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
