Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Scott Talbert wrote:

> Yes, I got fairly far with porting all PyQt5 SIP consumers (including
> calibre) to use SIPv5.  I think I then got discouraged at the thought of
> making a bunch of PRs and having to nag maintainers to merge them in some
> sort of coordinated fashion.
> 
> I guess - if I get everything working, would you be willing to merge a
> bunch of related PRs as provenpackager and do rebuilds in a side tag?

I'd be able and willing to assist here too, thanks for working on it!

As far as sip6 goes, I'd venture the adjustment from v5 to v6 will be 
smaller than what v4 to v5 was.

-- Rex
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux