On Sat, 2 Jan 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I think fundamentally the version of PyQt5-sip probably needs to match (or
be very close to) the version of sip that PyQt5 itself was compiled with.
I think for calibre (which is currently failing with):
...
/usr/bin/python3 -c import os; os.chdir('/builddir/build/BUILD/calibre-5.8.1/build/pyqt/pictureflow'); from sipbuild.tools.build import main; main(); --verbose --no-make --qmake /usr/bin/qmake-qt5
Querying qmake about your Qt installation...
/usr/bin/qmake-qt5 -query
These bindings will be built: pictureflow.
Generating the pictureflow bindings...
-c: Unable to find file "QtWidgets/QtWidgetsmod.sip"
...we need python-qt5 to be using sip5 also. I looked into it a bit, it
completely changes from using a configure.py to using sip-build and
PyQt-builder.
Or can we just add a subpackage there that uses sip5 and keep the sip4
ones for sip4 users? something like python3-qt5-sip5-devel ?
Or should we just convert everything to sip5 now?
I'd really like to get calibre building again... :)
It looks like technically you can still use configure.py to build PyQt5 with
sip5, but it does seem more forward looking to switch to sip-build /
sip-install.
BTW, can you please build PyQt-builder for F33? Thanks.
Sure. Also, co-maintainers welcome. :)
Thanks! BTW, I starting looking into moving python-qt5 to sip5. It
doesn't look like it would be *that* difficult. I thought about doing a
PR, but it might be better if the regular pyqt5 maintainer (if
interested/available) did it.
Scott
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
