On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 01:53:47PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:11:37AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/projectM-jack is retired , > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/publican-fedora and https://src.fedo > > raproject.org/rpms/gdesklets have the button orphan , why ? > > Because they still have a main admin? > If that main admin was "orphan", you would not see that button. > > And in the case of these two packages: > - publican-fedora has not been orphaned nor retired > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/publican-fedora/ > https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/rest_api/v1/component-branches/?global_component=publican-fedora&type=rpm&name=rawhide > > - gdesklets has not been orphaned but seems to have been retired > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdesklets/ > https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/rest_api/v1/component-branches/?global_component=gdesklets&type=rpm&name=rawhide > > > > Or better , when the package is retired by some rules like FTBFS or > > RetirePython2 , the package should be also orphaned . To allow other > > packager adopt it (IMO). > > We have a cron that runs monthly and orphans all packages that have been > retired. > Looking at its last run, it should have processed gdesklets: > > - Orphaning rpms/gdesklets from sergiomb > > - Removing access on rpms/gdesklets to sergiomb > > I'll try to debug why it did not. Found it, gdesklet has been orphaned :) Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
