On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:11:37AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > while https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/projectM-jack is retired , > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/publican-fedora and https://src.fedo > raproject.org/rpms/gdesklets have the button orphan , why ? Because they still have a main admin? If that main admin was "orphan", you would not see that button. And in the case of these two packages: - publican-fedora has not been orphaned nor retired https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/publican-fedora/ https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/rest_api/v1/component-branches/?global_component=publican-fedora&type=rpm&name=rawhide - gdesklets has not been orphaned but seems to have been retired https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdesklets/ https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/rest_api/v1/component-branches/?global_component=gdesklets&type=rpm&name=rawhide > Or better , when the package is retired by some rules like FTBFS or > RetirePython2 , the package should be also orphaned . To allow other > packager adopt it (IMO). We have a cron that runs monthly and orphans all packages that have been retired. Looking at its last run, it should have processed gdesklets: > - Orphaning rpms/gdesklets from sergiomb > - Removing access on rpms/gdesklets to sergiomb I'll try to debug why it did not. Thanks, Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
