On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 8:24 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > Hijacking this thread originally about > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 > > > > What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running > > "autoreconf -i" during builds that use autotools? > > I would prefer to do it because it aligns with Fedora's goal to build > from sources. But I expect it to be quite a bit of work. Maybe not for > each package on its own, but certainly across the entire distribution. > I'd advocate for that as well. It brings us in-line with other build scripts and guarantees that everything actually works. As I said previously[1], I think doing autoconf upgrades would be less painful if we always did that. [1]: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/ZZG3SNLFS7BSXQ3JFJDOWUS3WWGTGLR2/ -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
