Re: F35 Change proposal: RPM 4.17 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/1/21 12:33 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 12:18 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
     > On 31. 03. 21 21:52, Ben Cotton wrote:
     > >* Strict checking for unpackaged content in builds
     > > ...
     > >* Many existing packages will fail to build due to the stricter
     > >buildroot content checking. Fixing this in the packaging is always
     > >backwards compatible. We could temporarily set
     > >`%_unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0` in rawhide to alleviate
    initial
     > >impact if necessary.
     >
     > This is my main concern with this update.
     >
     > tl;dr If you %exclude something and there is no other subpackage to
     > own the files, the build fails:

    Whaaat? What is the point of %exclude if not to exclude files from the
    list? Why would rpm upstream want to break this? Seems like a completely
    backwards change that will make packaging harder instead of easier.


%exclude can be used for splitting up packages, so you can do

%files foo
%exclude bar.so
*.so

%files bar
bar.so


If my understanding is right, the above is what rpm upstream considers correct use for %exclude.

For just not packaging some files, rm at the end of %install usually works just fine (but people have also been using %exclude for that and this change would break a bunch of packages that do this. I'm unsure if it's a good thing or not).


This is what I have enforced when reviewing packages, except for Rubygems where the problem is endemic.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux