Re: F35 Change proposal: RPM 4.17 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 31. 03. 21 21:52, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >* Strict checking for unpackaged content in builds
> > ...
> >* Many existing packages will fail to build due to the stricter
> >buildroot content checking. Fixing this in the packaging is always
> >backwards compatible. We could temporarily set
> >`%_unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0` in rawhide to alleviate initial
> >impact if necessary.
> 
> This is my main concern with this update.
> 
> tl;dr If you %exclude something and there is no other subpackage to
> own the files, the build fails:

Whaaat? What is the point of %exclude if not to exclude files from the
list? Why would rpm upstream want to break this? Seems like a completely
backwards change that will make packaging harder instead of easier.

Zbyszek

> This fails:
> 
>   %install
>   ...
>   touch %{buildroot}/foo %{buildroot}/bar
> 
>   %files
>   /
>   %exclude /foo
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux