Re: Packages hijacking configuration files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 08:55:11PM +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> Am 17.03.21 um 16:47 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:25:24AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > Does Fedora has any policies regarding editing or replacing (say with
> > > symbolic links) of configuration files owned by another package?  That
> > > is, automatically on system or package installation, and not as a tool
> > > that system administrators run explicitly to make changes to those
> > > files.
> > I don't see anything explicit. There's:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_directory_ownership
> > which talks about a package owning all it's files, but it doesn't
> > explicitly say no to this.
> > 
> > That said, IMHO this should be forbidden.
> > 
> > Whats the use case?
> It maybe not Florians use-case, but we may have a similar situation on
> pinephone:
> 
> fedora-release-common-32-4.noarch  owns /etc/os-release
> 
> our spin should identify itself as "XXXXXX" via variant_id added to
> os-release.

Once we have a spin, yep. Right now all we have is a remix. 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Remix

> 3 Ways:
> 
> 1) contacting the package owner, and ask for his help on this case.

Once we have a spin, this is the way. 
Well, ideally we would submit a PR to fedora-release and just need to
get it reviewed/merged. 

> 2) a replacement package with a changed version of os-release is stored into
> copr ( higher priority )
> 3) a helper package post-script adds the needed line to os-release if not
> present  (*USE-CASE here* )
> 
> Whats actually the best way to deal with it?

If we want to have this now in the remix, I would say we could take
generic-release and modify it for our needs and ship that instead of
fedora-release. 

I'm not sure that it's up to date tho... :(

At one point it was nicely setup to allow just swapping generic-release
in and modifying it. 

Since the remix likely has a small audience I suppose those other
methods could work, but they aren't ideal. ;( 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux