Re: Packages hijacking configuration files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:25:24AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Does Fedora has any policies regarding editing or replacing (say with
> symbolic links) of configuration files owned by another package?  That
> is, automatically on system or package installation, and not as a tool
> that system administrators run explicitly to make changes to those
> files.

I don't see anything explicit. There's:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_directory_ownership
which talks about a package owning all it's files, but it doesn't
explicitly say no to this. 

That said, IMHO this should be forbidden. 

Whats the use case? 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux