Re: What next?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le jeudi 02 juin 2005 à 19:17 +0100, Mike Hearn a écrit :
> On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 02:51:34 +0200, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> > In short, what people who say "linux should use appfolders like ..."
> > mean is "please solve my install problems" which in practice would
> > translate to "please have only 1 linux".
> 
> Sounds good to me. Too bad the LSB sort of wandered off into the haze,
> what we really need is some freedesktop.org equivalent for distributions.
> There's no fundamental reason why packages have to be incompatible, a lot
> of times the differences are different merely through being apart.

We don't have the ressources for the "one linux model"
The linux progress rate is so high because a lot of stuff is loosely
coupled, so people can work on what they care about in parallel, syncing
only now and then.

Hell, even Microsoft does not have the ressources for the "one windows"
model. And they have lots of $$$, and scale a lot less in all
directions.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux