Since Fedora is also making the change, I'm wondering whether this voice should also
be heard. They're assuming it's just GLib.
Carol
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:09 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 09:50:18AM -0400, Carol Bouchard wrote:
> Hi Daniel and other Fedora experts:
>
> I'm trying to get the m4 package to change their code. They're saying this
> is not POSIX
> compliant change so they are resisting. See below snippet. I don't have
> the
> background to this change to answer their questions. Is someone with this
> background willing to jump onto the email thread to move forward with this?
> Let me know and I'll add you to the thread. Also I told them it's not a
> glib
> change only that Fedora is also moving in this direction but my comments
> got lost in the thread.
Looking at this thread:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-m4/2021-03/msg00000.html
it appears that all the right people I'd expect are already involved
in the discussion from the GLibC / Gnulib side.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
