On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 09:50:18AM -0400, Carol Bouchard wrote: > Hi Daniel and other Fedora experts: > > I'm trying to get the m4 package to change their code. They're saying this > is not POSIX > compliant change so they are resisting. See below snippet. I don't have > the > background to this change to answer their questions. Is someone with this > background willing to jump onto the email thread to move forward with this? > Let me know and I'll add you to the thread. Also I told them it's not a > glib > change only that Fedora is also moving in this direction but my comments > got lost in the thread. Looking at this thread: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-m4/2021-03/msg00000.html it appears that all the right people I'd expect are already involved in the discussion from the GLibC / Gnulib side. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
