On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 07:55:09AM +0100, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > Brian, > > I understand, but as I already said, compat package can lead to > unwillingness to move forward to autoconf-2.71. For example, we can have a > compat package for f35 to have time to deal with the problems, but > certainly not for f36 or f37. After release of autoconf-2.71, I expect most > of the upstream packages moving to autoconf-2.71 in one year time, so > hopefully no compat package will be needed. I think you are optimistic :) > > Why are you not thinking of moving parted to autoconf-2.71 ? Are there any > special reasons for not doing this? Nobody else is using it yet. Ubuntu, Debian, Alpine, and FreeBSD (and I'm pretty sure the other *BSD flavors) are still using 2.69. The Gentoo has it available, as does the Debian experimental branch but it doesn't look like they are ready for general use yet. We (the parted maintainers) need to make sure that parted remains buildable for all the users of it, not just Fedora, so it can't switch until 2.71 is widely available and is well tested. I have a big patch that seems to work, but that's going to make patching difficult for me until upstream is ready to switch so I'd rather just stick with 2.69 There needs to be a period of overlap to allow upstreams to experiment with the new version. Brian -- Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT) - weldr.io - lorax - parted - pykickstart _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
