Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 22.02.21 um 11:17 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
1) Use different defaults for different Fedora editions, e.g. container
and cloud images include the fallback DNS servers list while
workstation (and similar) images don't.
Yes, I think this would be the way to go.
Everything, that is not prepresenting a person, is not regulated by GDPR, therefor it does not "need" to comply.

About fallbacks in general:

Es the example shows cleary to me, having fallback dns means, that you do not see, that your dns config is faulty
and will fail in unexpected ways.

Best regards,
Marius


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux