Re: [Test-Announce] 2021-02-22 @ 17:00 UTC - Fedora 34 Blocker Review Meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 2:55 PM Tom Seewald <tseewald@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Under what criterion would it be a blocker?
>
> This affects (all?) users of Workstation running 34 or rawhide and causes users to unsafely force power off their machine due to the 2 minute timeout.  Many will be led to think that their Fedora install or hardware is broken. Shipping a release of Fedora Workstation that reboots without running into major errors or timeouts by default seems reasonable to me. Why is this a bad candidate for being a blocker?

I understand it's bad UI/UX and I agree. But what I'm asking is *what
criterion*, i.e.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Beta_Release_Criteria
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Final_Release_Criteria

Bugs don't become blockers only because they're nasty bugs, there's a process.



-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux